What inspires people to visit cities? Why does someplace like Minneapolis tend to have more tourist trade than, say for example, Boise? A simple enough question, sure. But the general trend is that large, lively, vibrant places with lots of exciting things to do and see tend to get more attention. Arts and cultural often factor significantly in the development of a place’s reputation as a destination. Public spaces and monuments play a role here, especially as famous locations in any given metro area may act as a magnet for sightseeing out- of-towners. It’s an interesting phenomenon, how we are drawn to places that are recognizable among the unfamiliar. Among the tourist set, there is frequently a compulsion to document the apex of the event by photographing oneself in/at/experiencing said landmark. It’s almost like it’s proof that we were there. Such is the draw of the tourist attraction.
VISIT Milwaukee, a local promoter of tourism in Milwaukee, has contrived a new destination in the form of a proposed bronze sculpture of Arthur Fonzarelli. Yes, the name rings a bell…is he a significant personage in the history of Milwaukee, or a leader in our Italian community? Ah, nope…. he was the “wise but cool guy” from the 70s TV series, Happy Days.
In short, the idea has roots in the TV Land Landmarks project where famous characters from old shows were erected in the city of their fictional settings. Ralph Kramden hangs out in front of a Port Authority bus terminal in NYC, Samantha of Bewitched fame perches on a crescent moon in Salem, Mass. So though this is not a project affiliated with TV Land, the idea follows suit with the Fonze and his Milwaukee connection.
There is plenty to be said about unreality here. Fonzie is a fictional person from a Hollywood show produced in the 1970s that takes a nostalgic and whitewashed look back at the 1950s. The show is set in Milwaukee, but could as easily be Cleveland. Ideas that there should be any authentic connection or history associated with the “bronze Fonze” seem to be moot. He’s meant to act as a prop for tourist photos. You in Milwaukee with the Fonze. Ayyyyy…
So how have some of these other projects fared? In our near environs we can look to sculptures that were part of the TV Land project: Bob Newhart in Chicago and Mary Tyler Moore in Minneapolis. Bob Newhart tensely lounges in an armchair in Gateway Park, gaze fixed on the couch next to him. He is, as ever, bemused and befuddled. As a sculpture and a work of public art, there’s a touch of irony here in the conception of the empty sofa (unless you’re on it, acting out a long hidden desire to tell your troubles to Bob). If you knew nothing of The Bob Newhart Show, nothing of his perennial awkwardness, you could still pick up something of that in this tableau, something of that hints at the bewilderment of living. There’s something of an existential metaphor in this empty arrangement; Bob is ready to analyze, probe, delve into your deepest fears and emotions. He’s ready, he’s set, pencil in hand…but there’s no one there. The element of exposure is interesting as well, as the private confines of the analyst’s world are plopped out onto a very public thoroughfare. Bring out the dirty laundry to share with all.
The representation of Mary Tyler Moore at Nicolett Mall in Minneapolis also breaks out from a TV mold and into something a little more. This sculpture was conceptualized and created by Gwendolyn Gillen, an artist from Wisconsin. Her Mary Tyler Moore is the figure of a young, exuberant woman of the city. Gillen bases the figure on the show’s opening credits, but takes some liberty in the positioning of MTM in the pivotal moment of tossing her hat in the air, a gesture reminiscent of graduation ceremonies with caps cast airborne. The expressive qualities of the figure go beyond the identity of a sitcom character and become a representation of the independent woman of the city. In the cases of Moore and Newhart, there is some substance beneath the surface that can rescue these figures from being schlocky objects crowding the city landscape.
So in the case of Milwaukee’s “bronze Fonze,” it will be in the hands of the project’s selected artist to transform a character whose mannerisms and words formed a large part of his identity as Mr. Cool into something that goes beyond the TV character. Would the trademark hand signal, Fonzie’s thumb up in the air, be misconstrued as a monument to a greaser thumbing a ride? And how does one visualize the vocalization, “aaaayyyy…”? And more importantly, what can the figure of Fonzie represent for the city? According to a promotional powerpoint by VISIT Milwaukee, there may be a motorcycle included in the project, which could add relevancy points in terms of fitting in with the identity of Real Milwaukee. But, can the inherent kitschyness of the Fonzie character be transcended through artistic expression? Or will he simply be an object, a thing taking up space for which plenty of money has been paid?
The problems of artistic legitimacy surround another notable work in Milwaukee, this one with quite a different artistic pedigree. This past spring in Susceptible to Images, editor and co-publisher Debra Brehmer wrote about the bronze copy of Michelanglo’s Pietà in the collection of the Haggerty Museum of Art on the Marquette University campus. Despite the fact that this is a direct cast from the original, it still is not universally accorded validation and acceptance as a work of art. For some, this is just a big, heavy lump occupying a whole lot of valuable real estate in the gallery space. If qualms about merit and substance surround even this work, then what of the Fonze and the potential for attaining respect as public art?
Even more importantly, questions of relevance must be considered. In fifty years, will we have any clue who this guy is and why he’s there in the first place? If pop culture awareness is what gives his character credibility and recognition, then by the time Friends and Seinfeld become the golden oldies, the proverbial TV Guide will close on Happy Days as part of the collective mass media mind.
Looking for an explanation for this curious figure, will future generations mistake the leather-clad one for a famous Milwaukee personage? Is he a civil rights leader, a progressive politician, is he possibly Mr. Harley or Davidson? Unless there are qualities in the final piece that can transcend the mere representation of a fictional character, and impart something of a spirit or idea that has meaningful substance, decades from now when kids are wondering who Mr. Dude is, we’ll have little more to say than sorry, he’s just a sitcom stereotype.
A bronze Fonze in the heart of downtown is pure folly!
Visit Milwaukee ought to know better than spend their time and money on promoting a bronze sculpture of a sitcom hero from decades ago. There are better ways to promote our fair city.
I thought Milwaukee's blue collar image had been rejected, at least by Scott Walker, when the "Blue Shirt" airport project died. Who will give money for a bronze sculpture that will be sited in the heart of downtown without knowing which artists are being considered? Who is making these decisions? I thought there was a process for vetting public art established by the Milwaukee Arts Board!